Hello Reader, The top question I get asked is “Which app should I use for my note-taking system"?” The second one is the one we will be talking about in today’s Playbook. Which system of tags and folders should I use for my notes and sources? First, a disclaimer. On 29th April 2022, I chose to go folderless for the first time and I never looked back.
When I moved from Obsidian to Scrintal later in 2022, my folderless move intensified as Scrintal had no folders at all. So instead of talking about folders and tags, I will talk about “containers”. There are two types of containers:
Traditional applications created folders mimicking physical folders and tags mimicking the use of paper tags. But as applications evolve, there is no reason to limit ourselves to physical analogies.
So now the question is: Which containers should I use for my notes and sources? The answer is not that simple as it will depend on your specific context, but here are a few thoughts: 1. Separate notes of different value Some notes increase their value over time, whereas others lose value over time. For example, the more you work on a note representing your knowledge the more valuable that note becomes over time. On the other hand, notes with reminders and tasks will lose their value when the reminder is not needed anymore or the project is long finished. So make sure you separate these notes from each other, either with X or Y containers. 2. Separate notes and sources based on a frame of mind Some notes will only be used with a given frame of mind (or a set of “frames of mind”), so it is important to know:
For instance, if you want to read, you may want to look for notes (or sources) that are not yet read. If you want to reflect, you may want to check recent notes or notes you believe you should “reflect upon”. If you want to write, you may want to look for the notes you have been meaning to write about. This type of separation is based on personal workflows, so it is best to use Y containers for those. You don’t want to be forced to move notes and sources around as your personal workflow evolves and your containers change. 3. Separate notes and sources based on purpose When you want to achieve something, you have a “purpose”. It can be a formal project or only a direction you want to move. In this case, you can use containers as your “backpack”. They contain everything you need to walk towards your purpose. An example would be containers for when you are developing a Conceptual Framework, deeply understanding a topic, or working on a report. The container represents the project you are working on. For this type of separation, I suggest using Y containers as the same item could be used for multiple purposes. 4. Separate notes and sources based on access permission If we are talking about the development of Intellectual Property you may want to keep a few notes with access restricted to yourself or a small group of people. Also, you may want to separate your personal notes from your work notes. In this case, X containers are the best as you can ensure there won't be any unintended cross-over between notes in different spaces. In some apps, you can still access both contexts at once by using a meta-container (i.e. linking your personal note to an item in your work container) without breaking the permissions within each container. People create containers for many other reasons, but I find these 4 to be enough for a robust system of containers without the overhead of maintaining it all.
There are too many decisions in choosing a system of containers, so if you want to borrow my system of containers (tags, boards, and notes) let me know by replying to this email 😊 If there is enough interest I will write a bit more about it. Talk to you soon. Until then, take care. Bianca *I believe X and Y containers could have a better name, but I haven't settled on a name I am happy about. Here are some options I have been considering:
|
Everyone can be a researcher. Weekly tips on how to beat perfectionism, manage your knowledge, and create your original contribution.
This playbook issue is part of the Research Roadmap series. In 2025 you will be able to choose which series you want to follow. Hello Reader, In previous issues, we explored your research vision and the problem standing between where we are now and that vision. Today, let’s introduce the idea of the Knowledge Gap — the missing knowledge needed to solve the problem and move us closer to your vision. In practice, when considering a problem, you may encounter three types of gaps: Practical Gap -...
Enrollments for the PKM for Research Mentorship are opening soon. Join the waitlist to be the first to know when enrolments open. Hello Reader, Welcome to the first issue of the Research Roadmap series. Today it is all about creating your Research Vision. A Research Vision is the future you are trying to build. It is the reason why you are conducting the research and, when comunicating to others, why you are asking people to fund it or give it any attention. There are three options on how to...
Enrollments for the PKM for Research Mentorship are opening soon. Join the waitlist to be the first to know when enrolments open. Hello Reader, Today we start a new series in the Playbook covering the different steps of a Research Roadmap and how you can build a Knowledge Practice that helps you each step of the way. The roadmap is divided into 3 phases: Phase 1. Building Expertise Research Vision Problem Definition Knowledge Gap Literature Review Reference Management Research Question Phase...